Most Overrated Band/Artist Ever

This is for all non-EC or peripheral-EC topics. We all know how much we love talking about 'The Man' but sometimes we have other interests.
User avatar
pophead2k
Posts: 2403
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 3:49 pm
Location: Bull City y'all

Post by pophead2k »

No, because he's the one who makes you feel all right.
User avatar
El Vez
Posts: 2085
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 4:44 pm
Location: Heart Attack & Vine

Post by El Vez »

Too bad about Jimmy going down and all. I hear that this time it's gonna stick.
User avatar
strangerinthehouse
Posts: 311
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: fort myers florida

Post by strangerinthehouse »

eminen
joni mitchell
nine inch nails
sonic youth
cheap trick

i never really liked beck before "sea change."

green day's new album is overrated, bought it then sold it. but they were great when they first came out.

i have london calling, it's great but i just don't see them as amazing.
And you try so hard
to be like the big boys
@shellacandvinyl
User avatar
strangerinthehouse
Posts: 311
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: fort myers florida

Post by strangerinthehouse »

eminen
joni mitchell
nine inch nails
sonic youth
cheap trick

i never really liked beck before "sea change."

green day's new album is overrated, bought it then sold it. but they were great when they first came out.

i have london calling, it's great but i just don't see them as amazing.
And you try so hard
to be like the big boys
@shellacandvinyl
User avatar
BlueChair
Posts: 5959
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 5:41 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by BlueChair »

Joni Mitchell is underrated. I used to think she was overrated before I actually listened to a whole slew of albums I didn't even know existed, like Hejira and Court & Spark.
This morning you've got time for a hot, home-cooked breakfast! Delicious and piping hot in only 3 microwave minutes.
User avatar
noiseradio
Posts: 2295
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 12:04 pm
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Post by noiseradio »

I think Zep is overrated as well, but then I think a lot of AOR classic rock is overrated. And that's probably just because when I was in high school you had three choices where rock was concerned: You could listen to metal, underground (for me) college rock, or classic rock. I hate metal (with notable exceptions), and I didn't know about the underground stuff. I listened to classic rock all the time. Some of it still works for me. I think i'll always dig The Who and to a lesser extent Hendrix. And some artists transcend that label, like the Beatles and Bowie. But hearing things like Pretty Hate Machine, Doolittle, Document, and Ritual del lo Habitual for the first time made me realize that all the fretboard wanking and pomp of most classic rock did little for me. I'd rather listen to Peter Buck, Thurston Moore, or Black Francis on guitar over Clapton, Page, or other guitar gods any day of the week.

These days, 30 seconds of Yes, Zep, Floyd, or Skynyrd makes my flesh crawl. But that's just me.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
--William Shakespeare
User avatar
Mr. Average
Posts: 2031
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2003 12:22 pm
Location: Orange County, Californication

Post by Mr. Average »

Zep is properly rated and holds a proper place in the history of rock and roll, in my opinion.

Considering the diversity of the first 4 records, the band rarely ("When the Levee Breaks"/"Immigration Song) took a simple tune and ran it into the ground (the "Pink Floyd Principle for Success" ). Songs like HeartBreaker, Whole Lotta Love, and many others from the first few albums featured a myriad of changes that were rooted in sounds that had, heretofore, not been incorporated into rock and roll. While the Beatles, Stones, and others listed progenitors of the Blues sound among their influences, I think Led Zeppelin actually derived a tremendous benefit from lifting, then adapting that influence to their unique sound. To this day, I do not see them as simply the leader in a large pack of bands that were all doing the same thing. They took many more risks, and they did indeed celebrate a driving sound that was elegant but simple.

While it was very much in vogue for a lead singer of that era to describe his voice as an instrument, Plant adapted his voice perfectly to complement the musicians. The high-pitched squeal that he found himself characterized by was not accidental...it accorded him a range to carry into the more bluesy numbers, when the band sounded like a different band entirely, and restraint was the order of the day, not excess for the sake of excess.

Towards the end ("Trampled Under Foot"/"Kashmir") they were reaching a bit to adapt to a changing musical landscape, and the machine just was not ready, willing or able to adapt.

John Bonham played drums like no other of his era, save for Keith Moon. But his signature was so huge, bombastic. While I am not an ardent fan, and I began to lose interest with the release of Houses of the Holy, I still think that they were able to draw on influences and resources that were, frankly, unmined, and therefore, very experimental and quite adventuresome. Comparing that to today's artists, who can freely sample from all that has gone before, I think they accomplished a lot, and are deserving of their place in history.

I recently completed a compilation CD of their work. The songs were selected to highlight their diversity and their ability to deftfully make changes on a dime and draw on multiple influences. Maybe that has colored my opinion on this.

And to name a song, "Rock and Roll" that is arguably one of the greatest Rock and Roll songs ever recorded is a gutsy move. Unfortunately, an entire generation of youth thinks "Cadillac" everytime they hear the song. The branding has been so perfect, so complete, that Cadillac has railroaded the song into the corporate environment. Nonetheless, It remains a great single, one of many that make the band better than 99% of the other bands of it's day.
"The smarter mysteries are hidden in the light" - Jean Giono (1895-1970)
User avatar
Tim(e)
Posts: 746
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2003 5:37 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Post by Tim(e) »

Last night I was listening to Hendrix's Little Wing and Long Hot Summer Night and got to thinking about this thread. I would defy anyone to say that Hendrix was overrated (and mean it)... in fact, I would go so far as to say that despite him being the guitar legend that he is, he is still underrated.

I agree that Led Zeppelin deserve their rep and that they are definitely not overrated (having seen them live twice in their heyday - 1972 and 1975). I would not however, agree that Page is the greatest guitarist we have seen; he just has a fairly unique approach... I would rate several of his fellow countrymen his equal for starters (for example, Peter Green, Alvin Lee, Robert Fripp, and Roy Buchanan) and then there are the likes of Elmore James, Johnny Lee Hooker, Chet Atkins, Jimi Hendrix, Larry Coryell, etc etc... all innovators and all equal, if not superior, to Page.
User avatar
noiseradio
Posts: 2295
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 12:04 pm
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Post by noiseradio »

I'm changing my answer to The Eagles. Hate them.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
--William Shakespeare
ice nine
Posts: 1213
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 9:54 pm
Location: A van down by the river

Post by ice nine »

I never really 'got' Bobby Sherman. 8)

A group of musicians that I feel are underrated is KISS. Their shows may be-over-the-top and they may be overrated as far as a corporate image, but musicianship-wise they are underrated.
It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think that you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt
- M. Twain
User avatar
King Hoarse
Posts: 1450
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:32 pm
Location: Malmö, Sweden

Post by King Hoarse »

KISS never played anything difficult ever (although some of their guest musicians did) and even manage to fuck up the simplest of riffs most of the time. I mean, they've admitted that even "KISS Alive" is overdub city and that's still embarrassing to listen to. Take the drums on "Nothing To Lose" for example.

When I was 9 I had all their records and won a KISS trivia contest but not even then would I say the original line-up were good musicians. Gene's pretty solid, but as for the others...

I mentioned Zeppelin because of their almost official "best rock band of all time" tag, not because they weren't talented and original. Of course they were.
What this world needs is more silly men.
Copenhagen Fan
Posts: 1192
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 3:00 am
Location: København, DK
Contact:

Post by Copenhagen Fan »

Maybe Zep sounds outdated now, maybe they got too big for their britches.....commercially. I still think they have some of the best music ever recorded. Take Tea For One, or the Wanton Song for example......orgasmic.
I'd never leave the house if I had a Gimp
Copenhagen Fan
Posts: 1192
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 3:00 am
Location: København, DK
Contact:

Post by Copenhagen Fan »

noiseradio wrote:. I'd rather listen to Peter Buck, Thurston Moore, or Black Francis on guitar over Clapton, Page, or other guitar gods any day of the week.

These days, 30 seconds of Yes, Zep, Floyd, or Skynyrd makes my flesh crawl. But that's just me.
Noize...I've been a pretty big fan of REM over the years, but kind of lost interest in their music over time. What's your opinion of what makes Peter Buck so great? Has he really played anything great since Life's Rich Pageant?
I'd never leave the house if I had a Gimp
User avatar
bambooneedle
Posts: 4533
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 4:02 pm
Location: a few thousand miles south east of Zanzibar

Post by bambooneedle »

I actually saw Motley Crue on the Dr. Feelgood tour... naturally, they kicked ass man. I still like Too Fast For Love. Vince Neil made the band (don't know what they're up to now), just seems to unaffectedly embody the certain hedonistic image or ethos of it however dumb that so many copycat bands would try to contrive; he really believes in it.
User avatar
King Hoarse
Posts: 1450
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 11:32 pm
Location: Malmö, Sweden

Post by King Hoarse »

I saw Mötley Crüe on the Theatre Of Pain tour. Probably the worst gig I've ever heard. Vince didn't hit one correct note. The funniest part of the gig was when they told Mick Mars to extend his already worthless guitar solo (because Tommy Lee had broken a pedal). He ended up playing the same three notes over and over for about four minutes at earcrushing volume looking very ashamed.
What this world needs is more silly men.
User avatar
cosmos
Posts: 537
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 2:36 pm
Location: The land of Cosmosis

Post by cosmos »

"Tea For One" is a pretty great Zep tune.

So is "Wearing and Tearing".
User avatar
noiseradio
Posts: 2295
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 12:04 pm
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Post by noiseradio »

cope wrote:Noize...I've been a pretty big fan of REM over the years, but kind of lost interest in their music over time. What's your opinion of what makes Peter Buck so great? Has he really played anything great since Life's Rich Pageant?
Haven't we had this conversation before? :D

I'd say give Document another listen. Then listen to the stunning acoustic work on Automatic for the People (and Out of Time, come to think of it). His playing on Monster is quite good as well. Then pick up a couple of discs by Tuatara, an instrumental group for which Buck is the guitarist. He also does some great work on the Minus 5's last couple of releases.


I edited this post. Somehow I managed to quote bambooneedle and respond to cope. Don't know how. But I meant to quote cope. So now my post might make sense.
Last edited by noiseradio on Tue Feb 08, 2005 5:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
--William Shakespeare
laughingcrow
Posts: 2476
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 8:35 am

Post by laughingcrow »

Greatest, most innovative rock guitarist ever.
Greatest rock drummer ever.
Brilliant bassist/pianist
Brilliant vocalist...

millions of Zepheads can't be wrong!
User avatar
noiseradio
Posts: 2295
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 12:04 pm
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Post by noiseradio »

laughingcrow wrote:Greatest, most innovative rock guitarist ever.
Greatest rock drummer ever.
Brilliant bassist/pianist
Brilliant vocalist...

millions of Zepheads can't be wrong!
Millions of Britney Spears fans can't be wrong then, either. And the millions of N'Sync fans are right, too.

I think the players in Zep are fine. I even like some of their stuff a lot. I just don't think that they're as collosally important as most. I don't think they're bad, just too highly regarded--overrated. But they're not the most overrated to me. Again, that's the Eagles. People adore these guys, and their music is SO PEDESTRIAN. They suck.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
--William Shakespeare
ice nine
Posts: 1213
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 9:54 pm
Location: A van down by the river

Post by ice nine »

Oliver's Army is over-rated. :D (I kid! I'm a kidder!)
It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think that you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt
- M. Twain
User avatar
noiseradio
Posts: 2295
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 12:04 pm
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Post by noiseradio »

ice nine wrote:Oliver's Army is over-rated. :D (I kid! I'm a kidder!)
I know. The music they play is so...unoriginal. They totally sound like someone else...can't quite place who.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
--William Shakespeare
User avatar
El Vez
Posts: 2085
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2003 4:44 pm
Location: Heart Attack & Vine

Post by El Vez »

noiseradio wrote:
ice nine wrote:Oliver's Army is over-rated. :D (I kid! I'm a kidder!)
I know. The music they play is so...unoriginal. They totally sound like someone else...can't quite place who.
Spandau Ballet?
User avatar
noiseradio
Posts: 2295
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 12:04 pm
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

Post by noiseradio »

I know this much is true.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
--William Shakespeare
Copenhagen Fan
Posts: 1192
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 3:00 am
Location: København, DK
Contact:

Post by Copenhagen Fan »

noiseradio wrote: Haven't we had this conversation before? :D

I'd say give Document another listen. Then listen to the stunning acoustic work on Automatic for the People (and Out of Time, come to think of it). His playing on Monster is quite good as well. Then pick up a couple of discs by Tuatara, an instrumental group for which Buck is the guitarist. He also does some great work on the Minus 5's last couple of releases.
Yeah we've had this one before when you dogged Jerry Garcia big time! :lol: I've listened to Document a million times, and there are some cools songs and cool guitar playing at times. But also VERY lame playing. Maybe I'll check out Tuatara. My Peter Buck fandom is more in the early period, Carnival of Sorts type stuff and Murmur through Pageant.
I'd never leave the house if I had a Gimp
ice nine
Posts: 1213
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 9:54 pm
Location: A van down by the river

Post by ice nine »

A Spandau Ballet tribute band?.........I love it.
It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think that you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt
- M. Twain
Post Reply